Jump to 2 Comments

02/12/2009 - How to Make 100 Cats Disappear
Posted From Animal Ark Shelter - Minnesota
Posted by Mike Fry

Editor's Note: when this blog post was written and published, it was not yet known what was going to happen to the St. Anthony cats. It is quite a coincidence that at about the same time this blog post was being written, the Animal Humane Society was already busy killing the cats.

David Copperfield could not do it better. . . the magical disappearance of more than 100 cats.

Unfortunately, there is more to it than smoke and mirrors. To pull off this illusion, nearly 120 felines will be killed. To complete the trick, the cats will then magically appear in the statistics of the Animal Humane Society implying they were "saved".

This is not a fake tale, or a made-up story. It is my prediction of the fate of nearly 120 cats reportedly "rescued" from a mobile home in St. Anthony, Minnesota.

We have seen the tragic saga unfold before: dozens or hundreds of animals neglected at the hands of an animal hoarder, a person likely suffering from a combination of obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia. The condition causes people to accumulate animals, usually cats, but sometimes dogs, rabbits or other animals.

The animal victims of people suffering from this condition usually display a variety of medical or behavior issues as a result of their lack of care and the overpopulated conditions in which they lived, which is not a surprise to anyone who understands animal care or animal behavior.

What is a surprise is that the organization charged with "saving" these felines is likely to use their medical and behavioral issues as an excuse to kill them, when doing so is unnecessary. When that happens, the animal victims of these cases are then re-vitimized by the organization reported to have "saved" them.

Because we have seen this happen before, I was saddened, but not surprised, by recent news reports that the 118 cats "rescued" by Animal Humane Society from a mobile home in St. Anthony, Minnesota were likely "unadoptable". "Unadoptable" is a catch-word in the "humane" community used to explain-away the killing of animals.

Even more telling is this quote from a Humane Society representative:

"The cats are receiving medical examinations at the Golden Valley facility. It is uncertain at this time if any of the animals are adoptable as AHS veterinary staff are seeing signs of health and behavior problems that are indicative of animals that come from these environments.

"According to Kathie Johnson, director of animal services, situations such as these are tragic. 'From start to finish cases like these are so unfortunate. These not your typical house cats. They are damaged from their marginalized environment—both psychologically and physically. It is a tragic situation—and difficult for our staff that is now forced to make the difficult decisions now that they are in our care.'"


It sounds reasonable, I guess. The problem is that it is just not true.

I know a little about these cases. Animal Ark has been involved in several ourselves. The largest case involved about 800 felines left to fend for themselves in a fenced compound in the middle of the Nevada desert. The picture provided here is from that facility.

The cats in Nevada had received so little care that some had resorted to cannibalism in order to survive. The animals suffered extreme medical problems, ranging from severe dehydration, emaciation, puncture wounds from fighting for resources, infections and more.

In some ways the behavior concerns were almost worse than the veterinary issues. Most of the animals were thought to be "feral" or completely unsocialized to humans.

In spite of the obvious obstacles, the rescuers of the Nevada cats did not see their issues as reasons to kill the kitties. These 800 felines were lucky. They were rescued by the no kill sanctuary, Best Friends, in Kanab, Utah.

Rather than killing the cats, Best Friends put out a national call for help. Volunteers from across the country stepped up to help. Veterinarians donated time and supplies. Foster homes took in unsocialized cats and began working to tame them. It was an effort of unprecedented proportion. In the end, nearly every feline was saved.

Animal Ark was proud to have assisted with that rescue, taking in, caring for, and training dozens of these felines. When they first arrived at Animal Ark, several of the Nevada cats could only be touched with training wands, gentle sticks used to get the cats used to being touched, without putting their handlers at risk. Nearly all of these cats have already been placed into homes. There are a couple remaining at the shelter, sweet, loving kitties who have gradually learned that people are friendly.

From this perspective, it saddens me that the Animal Humane Society would so quickly deem the cats "rescued" from the mobile home in St. Anthony as "unadoptable". If 800 feral cats can be rescued from the desert in Nevada, I am pretty sure we could save 100 cats from a trailer in St. Anthony, Minnesota.

Animal Ark has emailed and called Animal Humane Society offering care for these cats. Emails and phone calls have not been returned. Additionally, while I subscribe to many animal rescue email lists in Minnesota, I have heard no requests for assistance for these unfortunate felines.

By all appearances, it looks like AHS plans to do as they have done before: simply kill the victims.


Add Your Own Comment
Or, leave a message on the Animal Wise Radio Comment Line by calling toll-free (888) 668-0687.
Comments from readers:

On 02/12/2009 Mike Fry said: Great Post, Ellen

Ellen,

You made SO MANY good points in your post. Rather than asking for assistance with the cats (ie volunteers to train/socialize cats; foster homes for traumatized cats, etc.) they ask for money, and then immediately begin making the excuses for killing them.

Of course they are not normal house cats now. They have been through a living hell. That does not mean they cannot become normal house cats.

The remaining cats we have from Nevada are now snuggly lap cats, when you could not even touch them at first.

The "difficult decision" for AHS would seem to be less difficult than the work of actually providing the care the cats need. The only thing more difficult would be turning the cats over to an organization that would provide care for the cats, and get them adopted. Doing that would prove their entire world view of animal rescue was flawed.

"Saving" 100 cats makes a great headline. Actually saving 100 cats seems like it is too much work for them.


On 02/12/2009 Ellen Weinstock said: I'd love to be wrong, but...

I've been wondering about this, too, Mike. I do remember in the pit bull hoarding case a few years ago in Sibley County, Animal Humane Society let a few of them go to another organization to be rescued. But I think that was perhaps a half dozen out of three dozen. The rest died.

Meanwhile, there was of course a link with the story (about the mobile home cats) in the Star Tribune inviting people to contribute to AHS. But it was not soliciting help. Meanwhile, the AHS website is not asking for volunteer help, and says:

"The cats are receiving medical examinations at the Golden Valley facility. It is uncertain at this time if any of the animals are adoptable as AHS veterinary staff are seeing signs of health and behavior problems that are indicative of animals that come from these environments.

"According to Kathie Johnson, director of animal services, situations such as these are tragic. 'From start to finish cases like these are so unfortunate. These not your typical house cats. They are damaged from their marginalized environment—both psychologically and physically. It is a tragic situation—and difficult for our staff that is now forced to make the difficult decisions now that they are in our care.'"


I think we know what they mean by "difficult decision," don't we? C'mon, AHS, prove us wrong! Please, please, prove us wrong & save these cats! Just once, would you prove us wrong?